Size, scale and complexity of mission-critical programme led a major financial institution to seek our expert help for the largest bank merger ever attempted
This major international bank was undergoing a critical post-merger integration programme to merge all aspects of their global operations and IT systems as part of the largest bank merger ever attempted. Under the watchful eye of regulators, investors and media, the project was critical to the bank’s future success and had tough milestone timescales that were aggressive and inflexible.
It quickly became clear to the Merger Integration Office that the bank did not have the internal expertise to track, assess and manage all of the business operations and technology projects. For example, at the start of the merger, the client had already developed its own ‘issues management system’ with over 20,000 issues registered. Unable to focus or prioritise, and with pressure on deadlines and success increasing, it was time to call in professional support.
Strategic partner Kearney had been in discussion with Chase about a strategic partnership for the merger programme but were yet to be formally engaged. The prospect of a short, sharp strategic pilot risk assessment of the programme was attractive to the bank, and Kearney was given the go-ahead to undertake a $10k pilot over a two-week period.
It quickly became clear that the logistics and complexity of tracking and assessing all of the business operations and technology projects required significant expertise that was not available internally.
We used the steps in the SDA methodology with the following results:
- Scientifically predicted significant delays to the first key milestone “Day 1”
- Identified around 6,000 strategic assumptions globally
- Around 600 assumptions were deemed to be at risk
- Of these, approximately 50 were identified as ‘showstoppers’ – any one could stop the programme reaching its objectives
All initial efforts were focused on action plans for managing these risks.
Several risks required action plans that would be difficult for senior bank staff to manage alongside their day-jobs. Kearney was asked to propose solutions which led to several significant engagements:
1) Roles and responsibility risks: The two banks had many overlapping senior roles and this could easily lead to unhealthy competitive behaviours in the merger teams. Kearney produced a merger HR plan that rewarded positive behaviours and let key staff know where they stood as early as possible in the process.
2) IT exposure risks: The integration of IT platforms in Asia was causing considerable concern and taking up a lot of senior management time. Following the Assumption Analysis (Step B) it became clear that Asia was a localised risk. When prioritised against all the risky assumptions globally, a policy of accepting the risk and defining contingency plans was the most appropriate. This resulted in critical IT resources being allocated where they were most needed: in Europe and the USA. Proactive management was essential due to the criticality and visibility of the objectives and the unacceptability of contingency plans.
3) Performance measurement risks: Following the initial assumption analysis it was quickly realised that the operations of both banks were lacking in their ability to define and measure ‘success’. A Kearney team was deployed to define new metrics and key performance indicators for the merger process and beyond.
The success of the initial assessment resulted in Kearney’s ongoing participation in the governance of the new merger risk management process for the duration of the programme and beyond into post-merger initiatives in the merged bank.
The achievement of the first major milestone – Day 1 – to integrate all Global Markets Operations and IT systems was met with the rigorous and ongoing application of the risk management process to all key merger projects across the globe.
The second milestone – Day 2 – was achieved by extending the process to cover key business projects, achieving a single payment system and the legal merger of the banks. The process was extended to ensure that the key post-merger projects were established, using SDA to ensure that merger savings were achieved.
The client publicly acknowledged that the risk management process was a major factor in ensuring the merger’s success. The Wall Street Journal referred to the merger integration programme as “the textbook merger” . Kearney gained a long-standing and loyal customer as well as a multi-million-dollar contract, and the risk management process was embedded as part of the bank’s on-going programme of project management activities through a process of training and coaching the bank’s PMO teams.
For more information on our work with strategic partners, click here.